Credit: Univision
Last month, a lively contender emerged with an unanticipated and unprecedented confidence in his ability to go arm to arm with Venezuela’s long time president, Hugo Chavez. Henrique Capriles Radonski, the governor of the Miranda state seeks to defeat Chavez in the upcoming October presidential election. The recent commotion and continuous media coverage surrounding the upcoming Presidential election has incited interest among the more politically conscious Venezuelan people, who have grown accustomed to Chavez’s seemingly perpetual reign and eternal blusters. Capriles’ oppositional primary victory in February has given him riveting momentum in taking on the daunting task of superseding Hugo Chavez’s 13-year rule. The recent oppositional presidential primary attracted nearly 3 million voters, a landmark in terms of Venezuelan voter turnout. Capriles captured around 2/3 of all votes in the primary election within his party, routing Governor Pablo Perez of the Zulia state by an imposing margin. The youthful and enthusiastic Capriles has been more than willing to appear in front of a media hungry for an anti-Chavez spin.
Capriles has been packaged as a youthful and worthy alternative to Hugo Chavez, who has made the public slowly aware of the true nature of his fragile physical state. Though Chavez has augmented his public appearances following his short-lived convalescence, there still exists a lingering uncertainty regarding the stability of his health. Apparently, Chavez’s battle with cancer is far from over. The 57-year-old leader dispelled all speculations that his cancer was in remission as he made yet another surreptitious voyage to Cuba to undergo radiation therapy earlier this month. Nevertheless, Chavez loyalists remain confident in their long-time leader’s ability to run the country effectively. At this point in time, Chavez is more susceptible than ever and more attention is being directed to his obstinate and tenaciously-held position regarding prominent economic problems that have plagued the country dating back to the beginning of his presidential tenure in 1999. Middle and upper class Venezuelans have repeatedly expressed their disillusionment regarding Chavez’s lack of focus when it comes to formulating a long-term economic plan. Instead, Chavez caters to the lower class Venezuelans, reinforcing his populist agenda through increased spending on social welfare programs as well as fundamental communal services to impoverished citizens. Chavez continues to mobilize increased support from the poor who hold him in the highest regard, despite the fact that his promises to curb income inequality have been largely fruitless. On the other hand, Capriles has emphasized his desire to preserve many of the social programs aimed at assisting the less fortunate citizens of Venezuela, while also implementing fiscal policies that will allow both the public and private sectors to flourish. Capriles has evaded many of Chavez’s attempts to vilify him and he appears unscathed by Chavez’s chronic “a la bourgeois” comments. Capriles confidently recited his mantra, “People know who I am,” in response to Chavez’s disparaging comments, where he referred to Capriles as a “low-life pig” only concerned with catering to the elite citizens. The intrepid Hugo Chavez remains vigilant and he is perhaps more determined than ever to subvert any challengers attempt to replace him as president.
Credit: Flag Pictures
Aside from the fact that Venezuela could have a new leader to represent it in the international political arena, this election will also call attention to the importance of preserving presidential succession. The upcoming election will show whether or not Venezuela is capable of permitting a smooth transition of power, considering the fact that Hugo Chavez has been in power for over a decade. Chavez has faced biting criticism during his reign, for whittling away at Venezuela’s democratic foundation in his attempt to establish himself as the country’s absolute leader. Preserving the notion of presidential succession is essential in regards to preventing a leader from attaining absolute power. Additionally, the people of Venezuela will have more confidence in their system because they would know what to expect in a time of chaos should their leader leave office for any reason. Presidential succession is an indispensable aspect of democratic regimes, where accounting for every citizen’s vote is a defining characteristic. Typically, the incumbent has a greater chance of being re-elected so it will be interesting to see results of the widely-anticipated October presidential election. Capriles is the most formidable opponent Chavez has had to face since he began his tenure in 1999. An individual leader can impose policies as well as influence the greater political culture, so it is imperative that Venezuela’s electorate prepare to choose their next leader judiciously.
Capriles indeed has a chance to defeat Chavez because of the unity of the opposition and the deep concerns about governance issues in Venezuela. Chavez's health is also a wild card. (He has kept secret the kind of cancer he has, but his latest trip to Cuba was not "surreptitious".) However, this article fails to mention Chavez's sizable lead in virtually all polls, the advantages he has as a result of higher oil income, and the image problem that Capriles has as scion of one of the country's wealthiest families. We must acknowledge that the polls could be considerably off, due to the polarization and possible reluctance of some respondents to speak freely in some locations, but it is unlikely that the margin of error is 20 or 30 points. Finally, yes, Capriles says he will maintain social programs, but for better or worse, the social programs of Chavez are not just social democratic welfare programs. They are linked to social mobilization. I would like to add that all commentators are looking only at the presidential election. Of course that is the most import pending contest, but two months later will come important state and local elections. Chavez, health permitting, may win in October because many Venezuelans will not risk their social gains of the last decade, but the December elections will test the true degree of institutionalization of the Bolivarian Revolution, especially of PSUV.
His trip to Cuba was indeed "surreptitious" as the article states. Chavez does not want the public to be aware of his visits to Cuba. Look up the definition of "surreptitious" before posting.
Well, this article is interesting, but I find its politics a bit peculiar. I can't believe that someone from a rich, elite background could be a strong force for hopeful change. Red flags went up for me when author Farmanara said, "Chavez caters to the lower class Venezuelans." It seems that Farmanara can't conceive of middle class people such as myself who would think that gross income inequality was a great evil that should be done away with. I travel to South America a lot, and I have loved seeing the changes in Bolivia since Evo Morales got elected.
I cannot believe that the author claims financial problems have afflicted Venezuela only since Chavez took over in 1999. By 1998 Venezuela, despite being a significant oil producing country, was an economic basket case run by undemocratic 'democrats' whose parties still form part of the broad front supporting Capriles. The majority of people were living in hopeless misery. If the upper class Capriles were to be elected the country would quickly return to the dire situation of 1998. It will be a return to the past, to the 40 years of inept Punto Fijo 'democracy' which drained the country's coffers and resilience. Venezuelans need hope and promise which is what Chavez offers and what his ideological opposite but fellow soldier Marcos Perez Jimenez offered in the 1950s. Venezuela should not follow the example of Britain which elected a coalition government of rich kids which is economically arthritic, bought off by business associations, incapable of taking a decision because of the vested interests of the other partner in the coalition and seems intent on fighting wars on every continent of the world backed by illiterate propaganda, crass jingoism and pure lies.
Hmmm.. No mention the opposition illegaly burned the primary ballots or that the capriles family owns a chunk of the elite’s media monopoly in the country. Also no mention of vast improvements brought about through BoRev. Where does coha find these people.
Chavez will be dead by election day.
Libya with every good intention 'that has to bring democracy in Libya, given to the "cocaine and drug-free" will have' a lot to get busy and allows the drug free always consider to Venezuela, it is not clear yet whether the Libya will have 'intention to change manufacturer, maybe Chavez understands their impoverishment and want to relinquish power to the legalization.
You're all incredibly foolish! Can you just recognize the fact that Chavez is close to his demise, not only as a leader, but as a living human! He isn't fit to run the country and as the author emphasizes-Capriles will most likely be his successor, as he has garned substantial support from various constituencies.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts about Insurance.
Regards