Rio 2016 Olympics: Construction Struggles

By Phil Janowski, Research Associate at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs

To download a PDF version of this article, click here.

Since 1896, the Olympic Games have been a time-honored tradition, with countries from all over the world sending their very best athletes out to compete for glory. Sports and competition aside, the opportunity to host the Games is the most politically important aspect of the tradition. Given this responsibility, nations aim to show off their most decorated stadiums and entertainment venues in order to demonstrate their progress, development, and cultural strength. Predictably, a euro-centric bias has been present in the selection of the Games, with 30 hosts in Europe, 12 in North America, five in Asia, and two in Australia. This August, however, will mark the first time that the Olympic Games take place in South America; during the 2009 International Olympic Committee (IOC) meeting, the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, won the honor to host the event. Although the political, economic, and health situations have all been widely reported on, news of Brazil’s architectural problems related to the games have been comparatively muted.[1][2][3]

Tim Maia Cycling Path

On April 21, five cyclists were riding over a 50-meter portion of the Tim Maia Cycling Path in Rio when the section they were on was struck by a tidal wave and broken off. The bikers were sent tumbling 25 meters, resulting in two deaths. The path, which had been constructed just months earlier, is now under intense structural investigation by the Brazilian government in a search for criminal negligence. Michel Temer, Brazil’s interim president stated that “[i]t is a deplorable accident that must be investigated by local authorities.”[4] Brazil’s financial pressures in the face of the upcoming Olympics, paired with evasion of public funds by members of Rio’s state government, appear to be at fault for the cheap construction of the bridge.[5] Although the bridge was closed for repairs, Rio’s Mayor Eduardo Paes announced on May 20 that he was confident the bridge would be reopened later this year, and according to his “twisted optimism” (his words), the construction could very well be finished in time for the Olympics.[6] He has stressed, however, that safety is the top priority, not speed.

Rio Olympic Velodrome

Still under construction at this time is the Rio Olympic Velodrome, a new biking stadium. Unfortunately, construction hit a snag on May 30 when the company in charge of building the Velodrome, Rio-based Tecnosolo, filed for bankruptcy. Construction has now been expedited with a new company, Engetecnica, taking hold of the project. Olympic Game officials have insisted that the Velodrome will be finished by the end of this month, although they fully acknowledge that the timing is tight. Gustavo Nascimento, head of venue management for the upcoming Olympics, stated that “I’m asked if I’m biting my nails? I don’t have time to bite my nails.”[7]

Guanabara Bay

The Guanabara Bay is one of the many bodies of water in Rio de Janeiro in which athletes will be expected to perform. Intermittently clogged with trash, untreated sewage, and industrial waste, the bay is severely lacking in clean water, as the results of an extensive Associated Press testing session indicate.[9] According to the experts who tested the waters, none of the venues being prepared for the Olympics are safe for events, and it is too late for the kind of clean-up necessary to meet water safety standards. An official report by the U.S. Olympic Committee essentially washed its hands of the issue, saying, “There is no way to ‘zero out’ the risk of infection in any water.”[10] As with the Velodrome, Brazilian officials say they are working on resolving the problem; however, it is becoming increasingly doubtful whether there is enough time.[11]

A Chance of Hope?

As it stands now, the Games are looking to be similar to 2014’s Sochi Olympics in many ways. The Sochi Games, which were hit with a number of issues ranging from packs of stray dogs to terrorist threats, were still a relatively safe event.[12] Likewise, similar concerns were made about the 2014 FIFA World Cup held in Brazil and yet the World Cup proceeded with success. Even though some news sources have dismissed the Brazilian Olympics as a complete disaster, past events allow a fair amount of optimism for Rio 2016— assuming construction is prioritized.

By Phil Janowski, Research Associate at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs

Original research on Latin America by COHA. Please accept this article as a free contribution from COHA, but if re-posting, please afford authorial and instituional attribution. Exclusive rights can be negotiated. For additional news and analysis on Latin America, please go to LatinNews. com and Rights Action.

Featured photo: Wikipedia Commons

[1] Burges, Sean. “Revenge of the Right in Brazil?” Council On Hemispheric Affairs. N.p., 16 May 2016. Web. 07 June 2016.

[2] Langevin, Mark S. “Brazil’s Compounding Crisis.” Council On Hemispheric Affairs. N.p., 22 Mar. 2016. Web. 07 June 2016.

[3] Yeo, Wondia Mireille. “Zika Virus and Microcephaly in Brazil: Outbreaks That Question the Fundamentals of Brazilian Healthcare Efficiency.” Council On Hemispheric Affairs. N.p., 23 Mar. 2016. Web. 07 June 2016.

[4] Kiernan, Paul, and Will Connors. “Fatal Bike Path Collapse Casts Shadow on Rio Games.” The Wall Street Journal. N.p., 21 Apr. 2016. Web. 07 June 2016.

[5] Biller, David. “Brazil Heads for Worst Recession Since 1901, Economists Forecast.” Bloomberg. Bloomberg, 4 Jan. 2016. Web. 07 June 2016.

[6] Belen, Nelson. “Rio’s Mayor Paes Says Ciclovia Bike Path to Reopen in 2016.” The Rio Times. N.p., 24 May 2016. Web. 07 June 2016.

[7] McGowan, Tom, and Lauren Said-Moorhouse. “Olympics: Rio 2016’s ‘perfect Storm'” CNN. Cable News Network, 6 June 2016. Web. 07 June 2016.

[8] “Human Arm Photographed Floating in Rio Olympic Sailing Waters.” N.p., 26 Feb. 2016. Web. 7 June 2016.

[9] Meech, Grant. “AP Investigation: Olympic Water in Rio “toxic” Levels.”KOAA. N.p., 13 Aug. 2015. Web. 07 June 2016.

[10] Ford, Bonnie D. “The Promise Rio Couldn’t Keep.” ESPN. ESPN Internet Ventures, 18 Feb. 2016. Web. 07 June 2016.

[11] Veiga, Cristina, and Nadia Pontes. “Water Quality Will Improve for Rio Olympics, Officials Say.” The Third Pole. N.p., 24 May 2016. Web. 7 June 2016.

[12] Chandler, Adam. “Another Brazilian Worker Dies in Last-Minute World Cup Construction Accident.” The Wire. The Atlantic, 9 June 2014. Web. 21 June 2016.

One thought on “Rio 2016 Olympics: Construction Struggles

  • June 24, 2016 at 5:33 pm

    Where to begin?

    1. “Success of the WC; Yes, the 2014 WC looked great on TV. It was easy to sweep all the forced displacements, police thuggery, protests and safety issues during construction under a massive rug. The flooding in Recife was termed “a total debacle.” The country could ill afford to waste billions on stadiums will never be recouped, and a many Brazilians felt the cost was too high.

    2. Guanabara Bay; The USOC has no influence on how Rio prepares for the Olympics. It also has no authority to prevent qualified American athletes from participating, including those who will compete in sewage-infested waters. Given that the USOC could not have altered the outcome, it is inaccurate to state it ” washed its hands of the issue.” Also, Rio is NOT working to resolve the water contamination issue, and admitted as much back in February.

    3. Safety; The Russians kept Sochi safe by turning it into a militarised zone. Rio is doing the same thing. Google “Rio Olympics militarised city” for articles on how basic rights will be ignored in order for the city to look good for the camera.

    4. Prioritising construction–With 6 weeks to go, and thousands of workers at it round the clock, it’s not a matter of priority so much as brute force. And there’s the new subway to consider. Experts call for 60-90 days of testing. If lucky, Rio will have 15. No amount of prioritisation will change that.


Leave a Reply