Obama to Cuba: Who Benefits?

By Myra Miranda and Seohyeon Yang, Research Associates at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs

To download a PDF version of this article, click here.

Hopes are riding high on President Barack Obama’s trip to Cuba on March 21 and 22. Millions in both countries hope the visit will help ensure the continuity in the progress already made in normalizing relations between the United States and the island nation. Many others, including at least two presidential aspirants, apparently hope it will fail to advance an administration policy of rapprochement between neighbors, but will succeed in helping elect a Republican to follow him in office.

President Obama’s trip (with his wife, first lady Michelle Obama) is the first time in 88 years that a sitting U.S. president visits Cuba. In 1927 President Coolidge traveled to the island with the official purpose of attending the Sixth Annual Conference of American States, held in Havana.

As announced on February 18 by the White House press secretary, Josh Earnest, the Obama administration’s goals include:

 “advancing commercial and people-to-people ties that can improve the well-being of the Cuban people, and expressing our support for human rights.”

Besides meeting with Cuban President Raul Castro, President Obama “will engage with members of civil society,” Earnest said.[1]

It’s about time. After half a century of Washington’s desire to isolate Cuba, this historic event marks a peak for U.S-Cuba relations. Since July 2015, the White House has asserted that restoring diplomatic ties between Washington and Havana will allow for new opportunities to connect U.S. and Cuban citizens through travel, commerce, and access to information.[2] President Obama’s efforts to lift the trade embargo that has harmed Cubans for almost 55 years has been opposed by a Republican-controlled Congress that has shown little interest in ending the embargo. Any U.S. president so inclined needs Congressional support, since only Congress can repeal this exclusion policy.

 Contrasting Reactions in the U.S.

Not all Republicans oppose President Obama’s move. Senator Jeff Flake (R-Arizona) issued a positive statement regarding the president’s Cuba visit in which he stated:

 “For Cubans accustomed to watching their government sputter down the last mile of socialism in a ’57 Chevy, imagine what they’ll think when they see Air Force One. Just think of the progress that can come from one day allowing all freedom-loving Americans to travel to Cuba.”[3]

This is in line with Senator Flake’s support on the direction of the Administration’s Cuban policy. He had welcomed previous moves to re-establish diplomatic relations with Cuba, increase travel and contact between U.S. citizens and the Cuban people. However, he is an exception in his party.

Republican presidential hopefuls Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, both sons of Cuban immigrants, criticized President Obama’s visit to Cuba on CNN’s Republican presidential town hall last week. Senator Rubio has consolidated his stance against Obama’s Cuba policy by saying that he would not visit Cuba if he was President unless it was a “free Cuba.”[4] Senator Cruz denounced President Obama’s decision as a “mistake” in which the president would “essentially act as an apologist … before tyrants who hate America.”  He added, “My family has seen firsthand the evil and the oppression in Cuba. We need a president who stands up to our enemies.”[5]

Cruz and Rubio found common ground in regarding Cuba’s government as an “anti-American communist dictatorship,” in Rubio’s words.[6] Jeb Bush, the former governor of Florida (who has since called off his presidential campaign), termed Obama’s plans a “disaster,” characterizing the decision as an attempt to build his legacy before leaving the White House.[7]  For U.S. Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Florida), who was born in Cuba, it is “absolutely shameful … Pitiful that Obama rewards Castro with visit to Cuba while conditions for the Cuban people are getting worse.”[8]

In contrast to Republican political figures’ strong opposition, the U.S. public sees Castro’s Cuba positively, according to a Gallup poll taken last week. The Gallup survey’s sample in the United States recorded that 54 percent of respondents held a favorable opinion of Cuba.[9] It is the first Gallup survey since 1997 that reflects a favorable view of Cuba by a majority of the interviewed. Cuba, however, remains a highly polarizing issue for many Americans, and the partisan gap has widened. Gallup reports that the major changes in opinion relating to Cuba happened among Democrats.  In 2015, 73 percent of responding Democrats had a positive view on Cuba, showing a 28-point increase from 2014; there was, however, only a six-point increase in Republicans’ approval of Cuba side during the same period.[10]

Cuban-Americans, who increasingly favor Obama’s Cuba policy in general, have tended to oppose his intentions to visit the Caribbean state. A survey made on December 17, 2015, by Bendixen & Amandi International, a Hispanic and multicultural research firm, found that 56 percent of Cuban-Americans agree with Obama’s normalization of ties between the two countries and 53 percent think the U.S. embargo on Cuba should not continue. However, 52 percent answered “No” to the question, “Should President Obama visit Cuba before he leaves office?”[11]

 Cuban Ministry Upbeat on Visit

In Havana, Josefina Vidal, Director General for North America at the Foreign Ministry, welcomed new negotiations with her government, saying:

 “Obama’s visit will be an opportunity for him to have a direct experience of Cuba’s reality and everything we have been doing in accordance with Cuba’s sovereignty. It will be an opportunity to ratify Cuba’s willingness to continue building new relations with the United States.”[12]

Asked about President Obama’s intention to address human rights in Cuba, she responded that she would be open to conversations with the U.S. government on any issue but noted that the Cuban government has its own opinion of how countries deal with human rights, including the United States. She predicted, however, that dialogue between the two nations could bring great improvements.

Cuban President Raul Castro has made no public statement on Obama’s scheduled visit so far. He announced at the U.N. General Assembly last September that relations between the two countries can only be restored when the embargo is lifted and Guantanamo Bay is returned to his country.[13]

Despite claims that new negotiations with Cuba would make the United States appear weak internationally, one cannot altogether deny the advantages and positive impacts that can result from the summit-level diplomacy. It has been argued that the embargo should not be lifted unless Cuba is willing to abandon its Communist regime and espouse new economic and political reforms, including a democratic system that recognizes human rights.[14] After more than five decades of waiting for a result that clearly did not reach its objectives, Cuba shows no signs of renouncing its current system. Its citizens have been the ones most negatively affected by the economic sanctions, which have deprived them of greater access to technology, better health care, and affordable food.[15] Additionally, a study by Texas A&M University found that the embargo has cost U.S. farmers $1.24 billion a year in lost revenue.[16] Same study suggests that lifting sanctions could generate more than 31,000 jobs in the United States. Clearly, removing the trade embargo would not only allow Cuba to rise from political and economic isolation but also advance its reintegration with world commerce and global affairs — it would also materially benefit the United States and its economy.

President Obama’s efforts to normalize relations with Cuba have already set a precedent for his successors. History and many academics have concluded that isolating Cuba and applying economic sanctions to penalize leaders only end up affecting innocent civilians and fail to achieve positive or constructive outcomes.[17] Alternatively, a policy of engagement can create opportunities for people in Cuba and the United States to interact, cooperate, and do business. President Barack Obama is making important and overdue steps in repairing U.S-Cuba relations. The visit will be a legacy for his successors in the White House and in the policy establishment.

By: Myra Miranda and Seohyeon Yang, Research Associates at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs

Please accept this article as a free contribution from COHA, but if re-posting, please afford authorial and institutional attribution. Exclusive rights can be negotiated. For additional news and analysis on Latin America, please go to: LatinNews.com and Rights Action.

Featured Photo: Cumbre de las Américas 2015: Barack Obama y Raúl Castro Discurso completo, taken from NOTICIASMVS

[1] The White House. “Statement by the Press Secretary on the President’s Travel to Cuba and Argentina.” News release, February 18, 2016. The White House. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/02/18/statement-press-secretary-presidents-travel-cuba-and-argentina. Accessed on February 23, 2016.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Flake Statement on President’s Planned Visit to Cuba.” News release, February 18, 2016. Jeff Flake U.S. Senator. Accessed February 23, 2016. Available at: http://www.flake.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=D2D915F7-E168-4AF5-AB03-DCAE0457AB5A.  Accessed on February 23, 2016.

[4] Lee, MJ. “Cruz Prosecutes, Rubio Gets Personal at CNN Town Hall.” CNN. February 18, 2016. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/17/politics/republican-town-hall-highlights/. Accessed February 23, 2016.

[5] Ibid.

[6] Acosta, Jim, Elise Labott, Nicole Gaouette, Kevin Liptak, and Allie Malloy. “Obama Announces Cuba Visit.” CNN. February 18, 2016. Available at: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/17/politics/obama-cuba-visit/.  Accessed February 23, 2016.

[7] Dyer, Geoff. “Barack Obama to Press for Reforms during Cuba Visit – FT.com.” Financial Times. February 18, 2016. Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0843732a-d5fa-11e5-829b-8564e7528e54.html#axzz40Xp6HyXM. Accessed February 23, 2016.

[8] Ros-Lehtinen, Ileana. “Ros-Lehtinen Statement on Obama Visit to Castro’s Cuba.” Ros-Lehtinen Statement on Obama Visit to Castro’s Cuba. February 17, 2016. Available at: https://ros-lehtinen.house.gov/press-release/ros-lehtinen-statement-obama-visit-castro%E2%80%99s-cuba.  Accessed February 23, 2016.

[9] Norman, Jim. “Majority of Americans View Cuba Favorably for First Time.” Gallup.com. February 15, 2016. Available at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/189245/majority-americans-view-cuba-favorably-first-time.aspx?g_source=cuba.  Accessed February 23, 2016.

[10] Ibid.

[11] Amandi, Fernand R. Polling_Results_on_Cuban_Americans_Viewpoint_on_the_Cuba_Opportunity. PDF. Bendixen & Amandi International, December 17, 2015. Available at: http://www.american.edu/clals/upload/Bendixen-Amandi-Poll-Cuban-Americans-Viewpoint-2015-03.pdf  Accesed on February 23, 2016.

[12] ” Será una oportunidad para que el presidente Obama pueda apreciar la realidad cubana y seguir intercambiando sobre las posibilidades de ampliar el diálogo…  también una ocasión para ratificarle la voluntad del gobierno Cubano de continuar avanzando en la construcción de una nueva relación… Esta visita constituirá un paso más hacia la mejoría de las relaciones entre Cuba y los Estados Unidos.” Translated by the authors. Taken from:  Sitio Oficial Del Ministerio De Relaciones Exteriores De Cuba. Proceedings of Cancillería De Cuba Anuncia Visita Oficial Del Presidente De Los Estados Unidos, Centro De Prensa Internacional. February 18, 2016. Available at:  http://www.cubaminrex.cu/es/cancilleria-de-cuba-anuncia-visita-oficial-del-presidente-de-los-estados-unidos. Accessed on February 23, 2016.

 [13] “Remarks by Raul Castro Ruz, President of the Councils of States and Ministers of the Republic of Cuba.” In General Assembly of the United Nations. Proceedings of General Debate of the 70th Session of the UNGA, New York. Available at: http://gadebate.un.org/sites/default/files/gastatements/70/70_CU_en.pdf. Accessed on February 23, 2016.

[14]Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (Libertad) Act of 1996, § 6021-6091 of the U.S. Code (1996). See also CUBAN DEMOCRACY ACT (“CDA”), § 6001 (1992).

[15] Frank, Michele, Elisabeth A. Squeglia, and Robert J. White. et. al.  Denial of Food and Medicine. The Impact of U.S. Embargo on Health and Nutrition in Cuba. Report Available at: http://www.medicc.org/resources/documents/embargo/The impact of the U.S. Embargo on Health & Nutrition in Cuba.pdf. Accessed on February 23, 2016.

[16] Rosson, Parr, and Flynn Adcock. Economic Impacts of U.S. Agricultural Exports to Cuba. Report. October 2001. Available at: http://cnas.tamu.edu/publications/CubaFinal2.pdf. Accessed on February 23, 2016.

[17] Gottstein, Ulrich. “Peace through Sanctions? Lessons from Cuba, Former Yugoslavia and Iraq*.” Medicine, Conflict and Survival. Volume 15, no. 3 (1999): 271-85. Accessed on February 23, 2016.

2 thoughts on “Obama to Cuba: Who Benefits?

  • February 25, 2016 at 3:34 pm

    In an otherwise balanced essay, the authors of “Obama to Cuba: Who Benefits?” suggest that for more than five decades the US has been trying to get Cuba to espouse “a democratic system that recognizes human rights” without questioning the hypocrisy of such a view in light of a long history of US backed dictatorships that massively violated human rights and the recent attempts at the subversion of pro-democracy movements in the hemisphere. The authors also argue that “removing the trade embargo would . . . allow Cuba to rise from political and economic isolation.” But as COHA has pointed out on several occasions, it was the US that was politically isolated in the region, as well as in the United Nations on account of its policy towards CUBA, and that isolation was one critically important reason for the incremental and ambiguous moves towards normalization.

    Fred Mills

  • February 29, 2016 at 8:52 pm

    From the beginning of Castro’s regime in 1959, the US has taken a bellicose position against Castro and isolated the Cuban people for their choice of his leadership. It is time America dropped the facade about communism because the US National Security State has toppled democratically elected governments across the globe. America has the blood of martyrs on itss hands and it’s words of freedom are dripping with interposition and nullification. I applaud President Obama for taking a courageous stand to help uplift, liberate, and educate the American people regarding a skewed and outdated foreign policy toward our neighbors to the south of Florida.


Leave a Reply