Obama calls for recall referendum against Maduro during meeting in Canada

By Peter Bolton, Research Fellow at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs

To download a PDF version of this article, click here.

On Wednesday, President Obama called on the Venezuelan government to respect the “legitimate” efforts by the country’s opposition leaders to trigger a recall referendum against the country’s beleaguered president, Nicolás Maduro. The Democratic Unity Roundtable (MUD) coalition of opposition parties is hoping to stage the recall vote in order to remove Maduro from office and bring about the election of an MUD candidate to the executive branch.[1]

Obama made the remarks during a visit to Ottawa, Canada’s capital city, in which he met with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto for the 2016 North American Leaders Summit. He issued a harsh warning to the Maduro government, describing the situation as “very serious” and indicating that Trudeau and Peña Nieto were on board with his pro-opposition stance.

The outgoing president, who has only a few months left of his term, stated that Venezuela’s democratic process “should be respected,” and that this includes “legitimate efforts to pursue a recall referendum consistent with Venezuelan law.”[2]

He also appeared to endorse dialogue between Maduro and opposition lawmakers in the National Assembly. He said: “Together we’re calling on the government and opposition to engage in meaningful dialogue and urge the Venezuelan government to respect the rule of law and the authority of the national assembly.”[3]

He added that “political prisoners should also be released,” in an apparent reference to opposition leaders such as Leopoldo Lopez who were convicted of offenses related to the guarimba street protests that took place in early 2014.

Also seemingly referencing these events, the Venezuelan foreign ministry hit back at Obama’s remarks with a statement arguing that “it is contradictory and illogical to urge the Venezuelan government to disregard the state of law with the sole end of satisfying the antidemocratic interests of the Venezuelan opposition.”[4]

Representatives of the Maduro government furthermore pointed out that there are MUD figures who are working for the United States, which has long been hell bent on crushing the Bolivarian process and backed the April 2002 armed coup against then-President Hugo Chavez.

Conspicuous Silence

Despite the harsh words against President Maduro, who was elected in 2013 by a 1.5 percentage point margin, Obama said nothing of the ongoing coup against Dilma Rousseff in Brazil, in which political rivals conspired to remove the democratically-elected president on trumped up accusations in order to prevent their own prosecution on corruption charges.[5] Nor did he issue any kind of condemnation to Peña Nieto for the killing of several teachers by state actors in Oaxaca last month.

Obama’s silence on Brazil and Mexico, as well as Honduras, Guatemala, Paraguay, Peru, and Argentina, all of which have serious human rights problems of their own, raises questions about the motives behind his strident posture on human rights and democracy in Venezuela. It seems to be quite a coincidence that, unlike Venezuela, none of these other countries stand in the way of his drive to re-impose neoliberalism throughout the region via a series of “free” trade agreements, such as the Trans Pacific Partnership.

Despite having been first elected in 2008 on the back of lofty promises of “hope and change,” Obama has proven to be one of the most servile puppets of corporate and traditional U.S. foreign policy interests. He has been willing not only to reverse his position on free trade deals, such as that with Colombia against which he campaigned vigorously during his first primary and general election campaigns, but has duplicitously had them passed through Congress using the so-called “fast track” procedure. Likewise, his government’s consistent failure to condemn with equal vigor the pustchismo tactics of extremist section within the Venezuelan opposition, some of which have been violent to the point of homicidal, has demonstrated his brazen bias and partisanship in favor of anti-Chavista forces.

Though former President Hugo Chavez soon realized that he was dealing with a wolf in sheep’s clothing, he was at first regrettably naïve about Obama’s status as a figurehead of imperialism and lackey for corporate power when he called him “a good guy” and said if the U.S. president were a Venezuelan, “he’d vote Chavez.”[6]

The idea that the United States could ever have a benign role in Venezuelan affairs has been made nonsense by its continued covert funding of opposition politicians, use of isolation tactics via the OAS, and consistent selective indignation over human rights and corruption concerns. The Maduro government has apparently overcome Chavez’s earlier misplaced optimism toward Obama by issuing a bold response to the United States’ “interventionist obsession” and shameless pandering to opposition forces.[7]

By Peter Bolton, Research Fellow at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs

Original research on Latin America by COHA. Please accept this article as a free contribution from COHA, but if re-posting, please afford authorial and instituional attribution. Exclusive rights can be negotiated. For additional news and analysis on Latin America, please go to LatinNews. com and Rights Action.

Featured Photo: Taken from Flickr.

[1] Obama warns Venezuela not to block ‘legitimate’ recall drive, AFP, June 29, 2016. Accessed July 1, 2016: http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Obama-warns-Venezuela-not-to-block–legitimate–recall-drive

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Venezuela accuses US of ‘interventionist obsession’, APF, July 1, 2016. Accessed July 1, 2016: https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/31960347/venezuela-accuses-us-of-interventionist-obsession/#page1

[5] Aline Piva, Leaked Audios Reveal Plot to Oust Dilma Rousseff, Council on Hemispheric Affairs, June 6, 2016. Accessed June 29, 2016: http://www.coha.org/leaked-audios-reveal-plot-to-oust-dilma-rousseff/

[6] Hugo Chavez: I’d vote for Barack Obama, The Telegraph, September 30, 2012. Accessed July 1, 2016: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/9577744/Hugo-Chavez-Id-vote-for-Barack-Obama.html

[7] Venezuela accuses US of ‘interventionist obsession’, APF, July 1, 2016. Accessed July 1, 2016: https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/31960347/venezuela-accuses-us-of-interventionist-obsession/#page1

2 thoughts on “Obama calls for recall referendum against Maduro during meeting in Canada

  • July 1, 2016 at 6:22 pm

    Let’s start where we MIGHT agree: that the U.S. has a double standard on determining what constitutes a “criminal” government, and that double standards are wrong. I say “MIGHT” because of what appears to be YOUR double standard: you imply that the U.S. should have problems with “Brazil and Mexico, as well as Honduras, Guatemala, Paraguay, Peru, and Argentina, all of which have serious human rights problems” and I would agree with you there, but then don’t you believe in democracy and object to governments who try to deny people the right to exercise their vote, protest, and demonstrate against injustice. So why don’t you mention the tear gas Bolivarian police lobbed into offices where people were trying to validate their signatures for the referendum in Venezuela, or the Bolivarian National Guard blocking roads or the Chavistas who chopped down trees and set them on fire so people couldn’t validate their signatures? And what do you have against Obama standing with the people of Venezuela to take only way out of the disaster that Chávez and Maduro have created, that being the referendum? Why don’t you mention the double standard of the Bolivarian Government that politically framed Leopoldo Lopez (that’s the conclusion of Amnesty International) but can’t seem to do anything about the billions of dollars Bolivarian government officials have stolen and stashed in Andorran accounts? Now people are going hungry in the country since the Bolivarians have robbed the country blind, but that doesn’t warrant a sentence in your article. You’re certainly correct when you condemn Obama’s double standard and bias, but your defense of the Bolivarian criminals and narco-government of Nicolas Maduro (as even the Marea Socialista are now characterizing it) is cowardly and morally reprehensible.

  • July 2, 2016 at 7:14 am

    In contradiction to “Cliff” I do fully agree with Peter Bolton!
    Concerning the “naive” optimism of late Hugo Chavez when calling Obama “a good guy”, I think he wasn’t the only politician and many people of the world shared his (may be) calculated optimism as well, inclusively the Norwegian Committee when awarding Barack Obama with the Nobel Peace Prize.
    However, as it turned out, as any other US president, despite his hope rising speeches during his election period and at the beginning of his term of office, he has to continue with the traditional US imperialism, may be, he cannot help, but insisting on the US leadership, in the traditional of former European regimes, neglecting human rights and the right of other peoples to chose their own way of life not wanting to be explored by others.
    Nevertheless, the international campaig to free the “Cuban Five” had been successful!


Leave a Reply