Larry Birns and Frederick B. Mills

At a time when Washington ought to seize upon overtures from Caracas for the re-establishment of full diplomatic relations and direct talks, the champions of the antiquated embargo against Cuba in the Senate are calling for sanctions against Venezuela. Such an approach to diplomacy with Venezuela would be detrimental to the development of a more constructive and mutually respectful US policy towards the region. Now is the time for a Washington—Caracas dialog, not sanctions.

Democratic Senator Bob Menéndez and Republican Senator Marco Rubio have introduced a proposed resolution in the Senate that would call on the Obama administration to study sanctions against Venezuela. The sanctions would be aimed at punishing “the violent repression suffered by pacific protesters” by targeting individual Venezuelan government officials. Of course, any state actors responsible for the repression of pacific demonstrations ought to be held accountable not only in Venezuela, but anywhere in the world. Indeed, the Venezuelan government is already taking steps to address this. The problem with the resolution is that it reflects a very myopic view of political violence in that nation. It also reflects an unproductive approach to diplomacy towards Venezuela as well as the region.

Not all demonstrations have been pacific. A significant amount of the violent demonstrations are ostensively anti- government.  The “exit” strategy being sought after by the ultra-right in Venezuela has generated violent anti-government demonstrations that have called for regime change through extra constitutional means. In other words, through a coup or by creating the escalating violence on the ground that might provoke a coup or an international intervention.

No doubt opposition demonstrators are not a homogeneous group and many prescribe to non-violent means of protesting. Yet it is indisputable that elements of anti-government protests, using the slogans of “exit,” have deployed incendiary bombs, rocks, guns, barricades, wire, and other instruments of violence against government and public property as well as people, resulting in injuries and death. But those who have resorted to violence are most often portrayed in the press as responding to repression, as if the government has no legitimate recourse in response to violent attacks on persons and property. To be sure, violence is generally condemned by the State Department, but accountability is selectively applied predominantly to government actors.

The Council on Hemispheric Affairs has been calling for a change of course in US policy towards Venezuela and the rest of the region based on mutual respect and dialog, not imperial intervention and subordination. It was Caracas that instigated the tit for tat after the expulsion of consular officials, and COHA called the expulsion of US consular officials into question at the time. But now President Maduro has proposed a new ambassador to the US and direct talks with the Obama administration. The State Department has also, on occasion, expressed an openness to rapprochement, so now is the time to seize the moment, not wait to see which way the political winds will blow in Venezuela.

There is obviously a great ideological divide between nations that prescribe to some version of neoliberalism and those engaging in various experiments in 21st century socialism. Yet such differences need not translate into either hard or soft wars. At the January CELAC meeting in Cuba, the member states, despite their political differences, figured out a way to declare all of Latin America a region of peace and mutual respect. Meanwhile, there is a national peace conference underway in Caracas, called by the government, that commenced two days ago and includes an increasingly broad spectrum of opinion in the opposition, and seeks to overcome the boycott of the MUD.  This will take a pull back against war and for political competition through the ballot box.

Surely, in this context, there is room for Washington-Caracas diplomacy. Rather than impose sanctions on Venezuela, Washington ought to accept the proposed Venezuelan ambassador and enter into a dialog with Caracas based on mutual respect and the common goal of regional peace and human development.

Please accept this article as a free contribution from COHA, but if re-posting, please afford authorial and institutional attribution. Exclusive rights can be negotiated. For additional news and analysis on Latin America, please go to: and Rights Action

For additional news and analysis on Latin America, please go to: and Rights Action


  • March 1, 2014 at 7:15 am

    Dear Larry Birns,
    I would wish your President Obama and those responsible in his administration would read your article.
    Instead of going into dialogues with “mutual respect”, as Obama promised in his first election campaign, even towards Cuba. He seems to act like a puppet on the strings of fascist advisors in his surrounding, not only towards Venezuela and Latin America and the Caribbean, but also towards Russia and the Ukraine.

  • April 7, 2014 at 3:54 pm

    I do agree with what Josie said President must heed on to the issues highlighted in the article and take steps to strengthen bilateral ties with the Carribean and Asian countries so as to avoid the revert conditions and promote mutual understanding between the nations.

  • April 12, 2014 at 3:08 pm

    The Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on “USAID Budget for 2015” -(April 8.2014) revealed that even Republicans are impatient with the existing policies: USAID administrator Ravji Sha was humiliated by remarks of “Dumb, dumb, dumb!” about the ZuZuneo covert USAID internet twitter program which the Cubans had known about since its inception, but waited to expose in the wake of the international tsunami against NSA operations. Republican Sen. Jeff Flake from Arizona: “Juvenile! I want to see copies of all tweets! WHY DON’T THEY INSTEAD LET AMERICANS VISIT CUBA !” Sen. Menendez felt that U.S. tourism would finance the Cuba military, which he claims runs the tourism companies through shadow entities. But then Sen. Menendes ordered information about all other international internet tweet programs operated by USAID and copies of all ZunZuneo tweets. Sha suggested that those programs could be operated by “National Endowment for Democracy”.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *