<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brazil’s Bolsa Família after the demise of the CPMF tax: extension rather than extinction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coha.org/brazil%e2%80%99s-bolsa-familia-after-the-demise-of-the-cpmf-tax-extension-rather-than-extinction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coha.org/brazil%e2%80%99s-bolsa-familia-after-the-demise-of-the-cpmf-tax-extension-rather-than-extinction/</link>
	<description>COHA is an NGO specialized in monitoring Latin American and Canadian Relations for more than 30 years...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:22:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcos Flavio</title>
		<link>http://www.coha.org/brazil%e2%80%99s-bolsa-familia-after-the-demise-of-the-cpmf-tax-extension-rather-than-extinction/comment-page-1/#comment-6601</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcos Flavio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coha.org/2008/02/08/brazil%e2%80%99s-bolsa-familia-after-the-demise-of-the-cpmf-tax-extension-rather-than-extinction/#comment-6601</guid>
		<description>As a Brazilian reader, I would like to congratulate the piece&#039;s author. I certainly enjoyed reading both of his pieces about the Bolsa Familia. 

I think that there is an issue that neither properly addressed, however. On one hand, it is enlightening to know from where the resources to the BF&#039;s expansion came (and that there are other possible alternatives for funding), but, on the other hand, it would be as enlightening to read about whether this expansion (increasing the program&#039;s age limit) was a good move. 

Personally, I like that the BF distributes income to the poor at the same time that it encourages them to put their children in the school system. I just get a little skeptical of using the same treatment for 12 year olds as with 17 year olds.

Anyway, this is a concern/suggestion more than a criticism.
Keep with the good work,
M-Flavio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Brazilian reader, I would like to congratulate the piece&#8217;s author. I certainly enjoyed reading both of his pieces about the Bolsa Familia. </p>
<p>I think that there is an issue that neither properly addressed, however. On one hand, it is enlightening to know from where the resources to the BF&#8217;s expansion came (and that there are other possible alternatives for funding), but, on the other hand, it would be as enlightening to read about whether this expansion (increasing the program&#8217;s age limit) was a good move. </p>
<p>Personally, I like that the BF distributes income to the poor at the same time that it encourages them to put their children in the school system. I just get a little skeptical of using the same treatment for 12 year olds as with 17 year olds.</p>
<p>Anyway, this is a concern/suggestion more than a criticism.<br />
Keep with the good work,<br />
M-Flavio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

