|
Council On Hemispheric Affairs |
|
Monitoring
Political, Economic and Diplomatic Issues Affecting the Western
Hemisphere |
Tuesday,
July 26, 2005
Versión
en Español
COHA MEMORANDUM TO THE PRESS
The Beginning of the End to a Coherent U.S. Drug Strategy
• In an effort to resolve a part of Colombia’s decades-old drug and
anti-government conflicts, President Álvaro Uribe and the Bush administration
have yielded to the demands of the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC) paramilitary
group, thus discrediting their war on drugs.
• On July 22, Uribe signed the Ley de Justicia y Paz (Justice and Peace
Law), with tacit consent from the White House, granting preferential treatment
to high AUC officials indicted for war crimes and drug trafficking to be subject
to only token justice in Colombia.
• In a dual effort to protect the interests of U.S. investors in Colombia
while expediting a peace agreement between the AUC and the Uribe administration,
Washington has repudiated its anti-drug strategy by marginalizing the former
centerpiece – its extradition policy.
• Plan Colombia increasingly has focused on military operations, and as
a result, has not been responsive to the population’s grievous social and
economic conditions.
• What’s good for Occidental Petroleum may not be good for Uncle
Sam.
• President Uribe has addressed independently some of his country’s
social and economic ills, but overall has bought into the militarization of Plan
Colombia.
Colombian President Álvaro Uribe declared a State
of Limited Emergency in his country almost immediately after taking office
in 2002, which provided the backdrop for his implementation of predominantly
high-handed military policies intended to solve the country’s
incorrigible security problems. Arguably, the most important of these
policies has been the U.S.-sponsored Plan Colombia. Uribe has attempted
to use the funding provided by the Plan, more than $3 billion at this
point, to tone down the nation’s longstanding violence and implement
effective government control and a more visible presence of its authority
in the lawless areas of the country. He went about this task by striving
to negotiate peace deals with the country’s major armed groups,
among whom are the left-wing, 18,000-member Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionários
de Colombia (FARC) guerrillas, who have been waging a forty-year war
against the Colombian government, and the right-wing, 13,000-strong
Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC) paramilitary group. The AUC originally
joined Colombia’s civil conflict in the early 1980s as a private
vigilante group in order to counter the leftist guerrillas, and is
funded by private landowners and commercial interests who feel they
need protection from FARC extortionists, and also by drug kingpins
to retain their drug-smuggling profits.
Discriminating for the AUC
Uribe’s diplomacy has been deployed far more actively with the
AUC than the FARC, and has countenanced the alliance between the Colombian
military and the AUC in an effort to crush the guerrilla insurgency.
Uribe and the Bush administration have feigned a “plague o’ both
of your houses” attitude, but all along, both parties have been
far more partial to the AUC than the FARC. In fact, when it comes to
choosing between the two groups, the spirit of the common anecdote “the
enemy of my enemy is my friend” has been revealed, thus explaining
the deal Uribe made with the AUC. The organization has contributed, on
average, the lion’s share of the more than 4,000 politically-motivated
killings of civilians in the country each year, but the Colombian president
has all but pardoned commanders of the AUC for their unspeakably cruel
war crimes and drug smuggling, while not requiring the complete demobilization
of their fighters. Instead, he has offered them token sentences that
will be served out in veritable country club estates. In the past, even
the State Department has joined numerous human rights groups in acknowledging
that the AUC is a far greater human rights violator and drug enterprise
than the FARC, and accordingly, has labeled both groups as “terrorist
organizations” for their atrocities and the magnitude of their
drug trafficking several years in a row. Nonetheless, Colombian officials
have informally dubbed the battle-hardened paramilitaries “national
heroes” for their role in helping the Colombian military expel
the guerrillas from vast portions of the countryside while simultaneously
conducting hideous massacres of Colombian civilians.
Uribe has now received full support from the Bush administration for
a peace deal he made with “the devil” - the AUC - in which
master concessions were given in exchange for their surrender, and where
they will be able to retain most of their drug earnings. Also, the administration’s
hard-fought extradition policy was easily waived for senior AUC officials.
Colombian authorities privately will acknowledge that they expect many
AUC figures will return to their drug pursuits once the heat turns down
and they have “retired.” This scenario represents an abrupt
departure from what was once a key component of the U.S.’ Colombia
policy, and further demonstrates that Washington has effectively disowned
its understanding with Bogotá whereby Colombia would extradite
members of the left and right’s fighting forces implicated in crimes
committed against, or directly affecting, Americans. In fact, very few
AUC high officials have ever been extradited, and in spite of the AUC
being listed in the State Department’s compilation of terrorist
organizations, it has always been tolerated by Washington with a wink.
Unfortunately, the Bush administration’s wavering strategies under
Plan Colombia have distorted the Plan’s objectives and possibilities,
thus undermining earlier counter-terrorism and counter-narcotics successes
that have been achieved in the U.S.’ twenty-year war on drugs.
Colombia’s social conditions have continued to deteriorate and
the economy has remained stagnant as a result of a previous over-reliance
on poorly-funded initiatives designed by the U.S. under Plan Colombia.
Whatever progress Uribe has made in these areas has been less because
of Washington’s help than as a result of his own residual policies.
Also, critics have scrutinized the U.S. Congress for tilting provisions
of Plan Colombia on behalf of the Occidental Petroleum Corporation. Washington
allegedly helped the company acquire a major oil deal in Colombia through
diplomatic pressure on Bogotá to allow oil exploration in Arauca
State by the U.S.-based multinational petroleum company. U.S. preoccupation
with the perceived threat to 15 percent of its entire oil imports coming
from Venezuela’s anti-Bush president, Hugo Chávez, has fueled
allegations that the AUC has become a de facto ally of the Colombian
military by joining in with its efforts to defend the oil pipeline, which
is jointly owned by Occidental and Colombia’s state-run oil company
Ecopetrol, against sabotage attacks by the leftist guerrillas.
Due to perceived shortages of global petroleum production in recent months,
access to Colombia’s natural resources has become increasingly
important for the United States. Subsequently, within the framework
of Plan Colombia, Occidental Petroleum’s private security expenses
in Colombia have fallen significantly as a result of their being substituted
with the protection given by the AUC and the Colombian armed forces.
In effect, attacks by FARC guerrillas on the Caño-Limón
oil pipeline – which sends Colombian petroleum from drilling sites
to ports on the Caribbean Sea for export to the U.S. - have declined
in number and intensity as a result of the added protection provided
by Plan Colombia’s payouts to the Colombian military and the AUC.
A Brief Background of Plan Colombia
Plan Colombia was first implemented in 2000 as an annual package of financial
aid, mainly coming from the U.S. Congress for military, economic and
social initiatives in the country. The Plan’s funding qualifies
Colombia as the third largest recipient of U.S. aid in the world, and
has been designed to combat Colombia’s complex myriad of drug traffickers,
paramilitary and leftist guerrillas accused by Washington of supplying
ninety-percent of the narcotics found on U.S. streets, and of killing
thousands of civilians and hundreds of Government of Colombia (GOC) officials
engaged in countering their operations. Washington’s architects
of Plan Colombia have also used the forty-year civil war between the
GOC and the FARC as a cover for providing billions of dollars in military
aid to Colombia to fight the insurgency. The Plan has been frequently
criticized for its overt focus on military objectives while marginalizing
Colombia’s social and economic problems. It has been against this
backdrop that critics have questioned the nature of Washington’s
continuing commitment to Plan Colombia and its perhaps grudging support
for AUC demobilization.
The Bogotá-AUC Compromise
President Uribe has proclaimed publicly that he will do “whatever
it takes” to resolve Colombia’s civil conflict, and has become
the first president in Colombia’s history to sympathetically engage
the paramilitaries in peace negotiations. U.S. Ambassador to Colombia
William Wood, a hawkish advocate of aggressive U.S. policies in Colombia,
vowed the Bush administration’s full support for Uribe’s
efforts as he spoke in Washington June 14. He noted that while the AUC
has killed thousands in an effort to erode support for the FARC guerrillas, “there
are no set standards for a peace process” – an indication
of his belief that “the government has to recognize that [the AUC]
exists to bring it to the negotiating table.”
But Washington’s “support” for the peace process doesn’t
completely add up. A dual effort to protect key corporate interests like
Occidental, while trying to encourage a lasting peace between the AUC
and Bogotá, has led to an ironic, if not cynical, position on
its part. The Bush administration is on record as fully supporting a
deal recently signed into law by President Uribe with some of the AUC
leadership, which has given them official legitimacy by way of a bill
signed on July 22 by Uribe called the Ley de Justicia y Paz (Peace and
Justice Law).This measure grants token prison sentences to AUC members
accused of massive human rights violations and drug smuggling, in exchange
for their surrendering and pleading guilty to relatively minor crimes.
The Bush administration sweetened the deal by relinquishing its right
to seek the extradition of notorious AUC criminals that it previously
had insisted be sent to the U.S. to stand trial. The U.S. Drug Enforcement
Agency (DEA), the administration’s drug czar, has been adamant
in trying to seek the extradition of prime AUC drug traffickers, claiming
that forcing Colombian drug suspects to face U.S. justice has always
been at the forefront of the Bush administration’s drug policy.
However, under Uribe’s new policy, the prosecution of suspected
AUC criminals would be conducted within the notoriously corrupt Colombian
judicial system, and those found guilty would serve out previously agreed
upon short “prison” sentences in country estates in Colombia.
Until recently, extradition to the U.S. was a prerequisite for Colombia
to continue receiving military aid under Plan Colombia; it now appears
that Washington’s long-touted extradition policy is no longer a
pivotal part of the agreement, at least in the case of the paramilitaries.
In essence, the Bush administration gave up what it previously said was
the bedrock of its Colombia policy: Those accused of drug and human rights
violations that affected U.S. citizens must be extradited for prosecution
in U.S. courts because the administration claimed their trial in Colombia
wouldn’t be fair or credible. Ironically, although little has changed
within the Colombian justice system, apparently its courts are now suddenly
capable of dispensing “justice.”
U.S. Corporate Interest in Plan Colombia
Since 1996, Los Angeles-based Occidental Petroleum has had considerable
interest in, and influence over, the creation and implementation of Plan
Colombia. Occidental International Corporation, Occidental’s Washington-based
lobbying firm, spent $8.6 million to lobby the U.S. Congress for military
aid to Colombia. Bogotá granted it a joint partnership with Ecopetrol in
the Caño-Limón
oil field in Arauca State, which sits only six miles from the
Venezuelan border. Diplomatic pressure on Colombia by the U.S. was undoubtedly
encouraged
by Occidental’s heavy lobbying for the deal, leading to the company’s
successful acquisition of the rights to 44 percent of the profits from
future oil sales. Also, there was little doubt that U.S. diplomatic assistance
has been focused on creating conditions favorable for the company’s
operations – especially in Arauca. But Washington’s oil diplomacy
on behalf of Occidental, which was only one of the components of Plan
Colombia, repudiated the Clinton administration policy of only providing
aid to Colombia’s armed forces for counter-narcotics objectives,
and not for counter-guerrilla operations in the country.
The White House’s current reasons for continuing to fund Plan Colombia
have extended well beyond those that it has stated publicly. In 2003
and 2004, the U.S. Congress overwhelmingly approved President Bush’s
request that $98 million and $110 million, respectively, of Plan Colombia’s
allocated funds for those years be directed solely to the protection
of the Caño-Limón pipeline with a brigade of U.S.-trained,
and U.S.-taxpayer funded, Colombian Special Forces. In order to safeguard
Occidental’s enormous investment as a vital source of petroleum
for the U.S., with 55 percent of its production being exported to the
United States, and which also accounts for two percent of all U.S. oil
imports, there has been speculation by some observers that the corporation
has cooperated with the paramilitaries in an effort to stamp out some
of the more than 180 attacks on the pipeline per year carried out by
the FARC. When asked in an interview with COHA if Occidental could confirm
any ties with the paramilitaries, a spokesman for the company heatedly
denied
any such
collaboration with
the organization.
Nevertheless, of the $579.7 million that the U.S. has pledged toward
Plan Colombia for fiscal year 2006, $427.5 million, or seventy-four percent,
has been allocated for Colombia’s military and police, with only
$152.2 million being turned over to social and economic initiatives.
In spite of protestations of social reforms for the population, Washington’s
additional funding of Plan Colombia on behalf of Occidental Petroleum
suggests that Colombia’s petroleum exports, more so than the needs
of the nation’s economy or the social requirements of its people,
have been at the top of U.S. priorities.
Social and Economic Reform
Plan Colombia’s primary concentration on military operations has
amplified the social and economic grievances of the Colombian people.
The failure of the Plan to effectively improve the lives of the majority
of Colombians subjected to poorly-funded social and economic programs
has motivated Uribe to try to achieve some development with locally generated
resources that are independent of the aid being allocated by Washington
for similar initiatives under Plan Colombia. Uribe’s investment
of $900 million in his Social and Economic Reform Policy, funded
by a one-time tax on the wealthiest of Colombians and perhaps entails
the
political requirements of his presidential reelection campaign,
has been highlighted by four important programs. Employment in Action is an effort to decrease Colombia’s 15 percent unemployment rate
by hiring workers with little or no technical skills; the program assigns
laborers to one of more than 1,500 publicly-funded projects in over 200
municipalities throughout the nation. Families in Action provides food
subsidies to poor families in exchange for a commitment to keep their
children in school; Youth in Action trains unemployed young men and women
for future work with private-sector businesses; and the Roads for
Peace program repaves highways that have been decimated by guerrilla attacks,
which have subsequently hindered the country’s economic growth
by limiting intra-national commerce. Furthermore, the target of Uribe’s
policies has been primarily the regions of the country that traditionally
have been neglected by the government, such as Putumayo in southern Colombia,
where the land has been all but surrendered by the government to those
farming coca.
The Ironic Outcome of Plan Colombia
Aside from some degree of containment, the Colombian phase of Washington’s
war against drugs is moribund, if not dead. Plan Colombia has evolved
into another avenue by which the U.S. protects its economic interests
and allies in Colombia, leaving the Colombian people and publicly stated
counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism objectives in the dust. Washington’s
large military aid packages have helped somewhat to alleviate the financial
burden of the country’s war with the FARC, but Colombia continues
as the leading producer and processor of cocaine in the world. Through
some of his own policies and efforts, Uribe has been able to slightly
counter, if not weaken, the influence of powerful drug trafficking groups
in order to achieve Colombia’s goal for the moment: An interim
settlement with the AUC, one of the most dangerous and violent criminal
organizations in Colombia’s turbulent 195-year democratic history.
This
analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associate Paul Adams.
Additional research provided by COHA Research Associate Gina Peralta.
July 26, 2005
For More Information:
Brinkley, Joel. “Anti-Drug Gains in Colombia
Don’t Reduce Flow to U.S.” New York Times. 28 April 2005.
“Colombia: Big Oil’s Secret War?” www.corpswatch.org.
10 April 2005.
http://www.corpswatch.org/article.php?id=12116
“Colombian warlord considered top drug trafficker disarms. CNN.com. 15 June 2005 http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/americas/06/15/colombia.warlord.ap/ index.htm.
Forero, Juan. “Colombia’s Disarmament Talks Thrown Into
Disarray.” NYTimes.com. 25 May 2005.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/25/international/americas/26cndcolombia.html?ex=111777-1200&en=2df5166637c87258&ei=5070
Holmes, Jennifer S. “Drugs, Terrorism, and Congressional Politics: The Colombian Challenge” Contemporary Cases in U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd Ed. (Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, Inc., 2005), 33-64.
Leech, Garry. “Plan Petroleum in Colombia.” Canadian Dimension. Winnipeg, Canada: Canadian Dimension, Inc. July/August 2004.
“Next steps in Colombia.” Economist. 12 Feb. 2005.
“Protecting the Pipeline: The U.S. Military Mission Expands.” Colombia
Monitor.
Washington: Washington Office on Latin America, Inc. July/August
2004.
Selsky, Andrew. “Bad news piles up amid drug war in Colombia, but U.S. envoy unfazed.” Associated Press. 7 May 2005.
Van Dongen, Rachel. “Uribe Seeks Backing on New Law.” LATimes.com.
24 July 2005.
<
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg colombia24jul24,1,6066419.story>.
Vivanco, José Migue and Maria McFarland Sánchez-Moreno. “A
bad plan in Colombia.” International Herald Tribune Online.
16 May 2005.
http://www.iht. com/articles/2005/05/15/opinion/edviva.php.
Weiner, Robert and Dino Manalis. “Fix Colombia’s economy
to break drug trade.” Palm Beach Post. 30 Dec. 2004
http://www.weinerpublic.com/20041230.html.
Wood, William. U.S. Policy in Colombia: Current and Future Challenges.
Digital recording. 14 June 2005.
http://wwics.si.edu/index.cfm?topic_id=1425&fuseaction=topics.event_summary&event_id=132018.
The
Council on Hemispheric Affairs, founded in 1975, is an independent,
non-profit, non-partisan, tax-exempt research and information
organization. It has been described on the Senate floor as being “one
of the nation’s most respected bodies of scholars and policy
makers.” For more information, please see our web page at www.coha.org;
or contact our Washington offices by phone (202) 223-4975, fax
(202) 223-4979, or email coha@coha.org.
To subscribe to our free press releases, send an email to coha@coha.org
with "subscribe" as the subject. 1
Memorandum
to the Press 05.82