|
1250 Connecticut Ave. NW, |
|
|
Council On Hemispheric Affairs |
|
|
Monitoring
Political, Economic and Diplomatic Issues Affecting the Western
Hemisphere |
|
|
Memorandum to the Press 05.08 |
|
Word Count: 2050
Tuesday, 25 January, 2005
and Political Times Ahead
•
Throughout 2004, the race for Mexico’s 2006 presidential elections intensified,
largely relegating the country’s economic development to the backburner and
leaving little hope that President Vicente Fox can carry out significant
reforms in
the remaining time of his otherwise disappointing presidency.
• Barring some unforeseen development, Mexico City’s mayor, Andrés Manuel
López Obrador, Partido Revolucionario Institutional’s (PRI) president
Roberto Madrazo and the PAN Minister of the Interior Santiago Creel are likely
to be the leading contenders in the 2006 presidential ballot.
• Other political figures, including former Foreign Minister Jorge Castañeda,
Mexico State governor Arturo Montiel and former Energy Minister Felipe Calderón
are also likely candidates but in several cases have little or no chance of
winning their parties’ candidacy, let alone the presidency, and most likely
will have little or no impact on the race.
• On December 7, 2004 Fox nominated Foreign Minister Luis Ernesto Derbez to
be Mexico’s candidate for the Organization of American States (OAS) Secretary-General.
Derbez could have become an obstacle to the prospective nomination of Fox’s
favored candidate, Santiago Creel, so the OAS nomination can be looked upon
as a consolation prize for Derbez in order to clear the way for Creel.
Almost immediately after Vicente Fox’s 2000 election, one of the most salient
issues in Mexican politics was the upcoming 2006 presidential race. Analysts
and political figures have speculated whether PAN could pull off another surprise
election victory, or whether the PRI, the nation’s traditional ruling party,
would be able to wrest back executive control, which it had previously exercised
for decades. One other possibility would be that for the first time, a candidate
from the left-of-center Democratic Revolution Party (PRD) would be the one
to move into the Los Pinos presidential residence.
Now that the election is less than two years away, the list of possible candidates
is nearly complete, with polls showing the PRD’s Andrés Manuel López
Obrador narrowly leading the pack – as he has for two years – slightly ahead
of the PRI’s Roberto Madrazo and Santiago Creel of the PAN. As the three main
political parties now initiate a force-draft battle for the presidency, Mexico
continues to struggle with slowed economic growth, rising unemployment and
disjointed relations between Congress and the president. Furthermore, Fox’s
goal of negotiating a bilateral agreement regulating the millions of illegal
Mexican immigrants now in the United States is still far out of reach and much-needed
energy, institutional and income-tax reforms have yet to be approved by Congress.
Most members of the political class would have you believe that there is little
possibility for substantial progress during Fox’s remaining time in office.
Fox vs. Congress
Although Fox’s presidency had an auspicious beginning following the series
of PRI scandals that helped him win the office, PAN’s lack of governing experience
on the national level soon became evident. In one of his first actions as president,
Fox proposed a controversial fiscal reform to increase government revenue by
instituting imposts on food and medicine, a measure intended to tax the 35-40
percent of the population that currently evades taxes. The PRI, looking to
take political advantage of the unpopularity of these reforms, but wracked
by bitter internal reform, tore into them. Unfortunately for Fox, this was
just the beginning of what would grow into tense relations between Congress
and his office, as well as continuous strife between the ruling PAN and the
now faction-ridden PRI-led opposition. Further reforms directed at the energy
and fiscal sectors have been blocked by a Congress intent on paralyzing the
Fox government and shrinking PAN’s popularity in anticipation of the 2006 elections.
The Contenders
Currently, the opposition candidates seem to hold a modest advantage over the
PAN’s presumptive nominee. However, the PRD is the only party that has its
candidate more or less determined, although López Obrador has yet to
declare his formal candidacy and is unlikely to do so in the near future. By
delaying such an announcement he avoids pressure from his adversaries to step
down as Mexico City’s mayor. During his tenure as mayor, López Obrador
attracted wide popular support, but a recent poll conducted by the respected
Mexican daily El Universal is now showing a 4 percent decrease in public approval
over the past year. Polls by Ipso-Bimsa and the Mexico City daily Reforma show
López Obrador holding a slight lead among the current presidential candidates,
with 29 percent, compared to Madrazo’s 27 and Creel’s 26. López Obrador’s
backing stems from his social policies, which walk a fine line between populism
and pragmatism, and his relentless criticism of Fox. However, his image has
been damaged as a result of corruption scandals involving Mexico City municipal
officials, but not himself. López Obrador contends that these scandals
are part of a smear campaign orchestrated by opposition forces afraid of his
popularity.
Meanwhile, the Fox administration has had its own problems prompted by the
upcoming election. The Mexican president was embarrassed in 2003 when then
Foreign Minister Jorge Castañeda resigned from his post to begin his
quest for the presidency. Despite polls showing he would receive only 3 percent
of the vote, Castañeda, currently an independent candidate, has stayed
in the race because, as he sees it, “the citizens want a different alternative
to the three big parties that have paralyzed the country.” Others would maintain
that Castañeda is doing nothing more than cannily looking for a new
political roost after alienating many Mexicans for his outspoken backing of
the U.S. and his unexpectedly fierce anti-Cuba stance. Another complicating
factor is furnished by Fox’s former Energy Minister, Felipe Calderón,
who has made public his intention to become the PAN’s candidate in 2006, thus
setting the stage for a confrontation with Creel. A shrewd politician, Calderón
has stated that should he win the presidency, he would try to improve relations
with the opposition by possibly naming PRI members to his cabinet, a move that
could win him legislative votes. National polls have yet to provide enough
information to determine Calderón’s vote drawing power.
On November 29, Reforma published an interview with Foreign Minister Derbez
in which he revealed his desire to be the PAN’s candidate in the 2006 elections,
saying he is “the only one that can give continuity to President Vicente Fox’s
project.” Such a statement, far from attracting voters, might actually keep
them away, considering Fox’s flagging popularity. However, on December 7, Fox
announced that Derbez was to be Mexico’s candidate to head the OAS Secretariat,
which most political observers consider to be a way of moving Derbez from the
presidential race in order to clear the way for Creel’s candidacy.
Minister of the Interior Creel, the most likely PAN candidate, would receive
26 percent of the vote if the election were held today, placing him just behind
López Obrador and Madrazo. Throughout the year, López Obrador
consistently criticized Creel for not fulfilling his government responsibilities
and instead devoting his attention to his campaign and political dealings that
might earn him support in the elections.
Of all the candidates, Roberto Madrazo has remained the most discreet, focusing
his attention on winning the PRI’s nomination. By not coming out too strongly
on the issue, he is trying not to split the PRI internally, which would weaken
his prospects as a candidate. In any event, Madrazo has the distinct advantage
of belonging to the country’s most popular party. The PRI’s gradual return
to its historical status as a political powerhouse may be related to its stability
in opposition during the Fox administration. Its expanding popularity became
evident in the 2003 by-term elections as well as in recent gains in the number
of congressional seats it held and in gubernatorial elections of key states
like Nuevo León, Chihuahua and Veracruz, among others. While the PAN
and PRD were engaging in puerile confrontations, the PRI has shown its ability
to skillfully negotiate and align itself with several of the smaller Mexican
parties, such as Partido del Trabajo, Partido Verde Ecologista
de México and Convergencia por la Democracia.
Internal Disputes
The upcoming elections have the potential to be the closest in Mexican history,
not only due to information gleaned from recent polls, but also as a result
of the internal crisis presently evident in the three main Mexican parties.
The PRD’s main shortcoming lies in its lack of national structure even though
its candidate, López Obrador, remains a very popular political figure
and one of the favorites for the 2006 presidential election. However, his popularity
and voting base is concentrated mainly in the center and southern parts of
Mexico. As much as the left-of-center PRD would like to consider itself as
an already strong competitor, it is imperative that the party focus on expanding
its popularity country-wide. Furthermore, the three-time presidential candidate
and moral leader of the PRD, Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas Solórzano,
remained opposed to López Obrador’s candidacy as he considers himself
the most suitable choice to head the ticket. Nonetheless, some of the national
press and many PRD activists consider Cárdenas Solórzano’s son,
Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas Batel, as López Obrador’s logical
pinch hitter if the latter’s campaign unexpectedly falters.
On the other hand, the PAN’s Creel takes note of the internal disputes between
the Fox-supporters and the conservative figures, represented by Felipe Calderón
and the current PAN president Luis Felipe Bravo Mena. Besides the problems
Creel may have, which are intrinsic to his own background, his campaign for
the nomination will surely have to face multiple obstacles if he is to change
the current PAN image. This challenge could result from the Fox administration’s
essentially failed legacy and from having to create a winning strategy that
will be attractive to the broader Mexican electorate as well as to his immediate
Panista base.
Finally, the internal contest for the PRI’s nomination may present some trouble
for Madrazo, as many party members see him as a corrupt figure who could tempt
a susceptible PRI to return to the venal practices that traditionally characterized
the former ruling party’s authoritarian and crooked politics. The inclusion
of corruption’s “dynamic duo,” the brothers Jorge and Carlos Hank Rohn, in
Madrazo-backed campaigns in Tijuana and the State of Mexico, respectively,
are clear evidence of Madrazo’s well-known link to the shady side of Mexico’s
political practices.
If Madrazo fails to win the PRI’s candidacy, then likely rivals, such as Arturo
Montiel, Senator Enrique Jackson and former governor Tomás Yarrington
are likely to emerge as possible entries. Nevertheless, it is important to
consider that Madrazo will “duel to the death” against anyone with pretences
to displace him from bearing the PRI’s colors, which he previously failed to
capture while seeking the party’s nomination in 2000.
Mexico’s Future
The battle for the 2006 presidency began the moment Vicente Fox was first elected.
During Fox’s increasingly disappointing tenure, the upcoming election became
a permanent factor in breeding tension among all of the parties, none of which
were willing to yield an inch, to the detriment of the country’s economic development
and political stability. During this period, the opposition parties were hardly
interested in creating benign environment that would help realize Fox’s legislative
agenda or fulfill PAN’s vision of a more prosperous Mexico. In the end, as
has occurred time and time again in more than one country, political interests
have blocked the much-needed changes that could bring improvements to Mexico.
In the following months the fight for the nomination and then for the presidency
will intensify. However, it is important to remember that the Fox administration
has nearly two more years in office. Although some Mexicans would like to believe
that at long last democracy is a reality in their country, political infighting
consistently trumps the proven needs of the population. But many Mexican voters
insist that the parties and the politicians involved in the elections should
now start proving their worth by working for the good of the country. The Fox
administration, Congress and the country’s leading political actors have done
a lackluster job of prioritizing the well-being of the citizenry. If politicians
single-mindedly keep their focus on the 2006 elections rather than Mexico’s
pressing needs, Mexicans can expect more of the self-serving antics and political
superficiality with which they have become familiar in the past four years.
This
analysis was prepared by Alejandro Macías, COHA Research Associate.
January
25, 2005
The
Council on Hemispheric Affairs, founded in 1975, is an independent,
non-profit, non-partisan, tax-exempt research and information organization.
It has been described on the Senate floor as being “one of the nation’s
most respected bodies of scholars and policy makers.” For more information,
please see our web page at www.coha.org; or contact our Washington
offices by phone (202) 223-4975, fax (202) 223-4979, or email coha@coha.org.